Impact of a Fellowship-Trained Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeon on Patient Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES As the performance of minimally invasive hysterectomy has increased in the United States, the need to apply outcomes measures has also increased. This study was conducted to determine the impact of a fellowship-trained minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) specialist on patient outcomes after laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) in a gynecology department. METHODS This is a retrospective review of 218 patients who underwent a laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications at a suburban academic-affiliated tertiary care hospital with a broad patient base from 2010 to 2014. RESULTS A total of 218 women underwent conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy by 10 members of a gynecology department: 96 women (44%) by a MIGS specialist and 122 women (56%) by a group of general gynecologists. Operative time was less (119 vs 148 min; P < .001), and patients were more likely to be discharged on the same day (90.6% vs 66.4%; P < .001) for the MIGS specialist compared to other surgeons. More patients of the MIGS specialist had undergone prior laparotomies (42.7% vs 17.2%; P = < .001) and had a greater uterine weight (392 vs 224 g; P < .001). Although the difference was not statistically significant, conversion to laparotomy (0 vs 2 cases; P = .505) and postoperative infection (6 vs 16 cases; P = .095) were lower for the MIGS specialist. Total billing charges were also lower for the MIGS specialist ($9,920 vs $11,406; P < .001). CONCLUSION A fellowship-trained MIGS specialist performed laparoscopic hysterectomy in less time on more difficult surgical patients, with a shorter length of stay and lower costs, and no difference in complications compared to other providers in a gynecology department.